
A Line You Have Traced
by: Roisin Dunnett
April 15, 2025 The Feminist Press
328 pages
Review by: Valerie Estelle Frankel
A Line You Have Traced is a slow generational story, comparing women’s lives across time. In that way, it suggests The Hours or The Female Man. Bea is Jewish, working in her husband’s jewelry store in the Jewish East End of London after World War I. The angel who repeatedly visits her suggests a trace of hope in her dark life. Still, she knows her husband will never believe her about these visitations. Meanwhile, fascism is rising and presenting a constant threat. Towards the end of the story, Bea has embraced Judaism more deeply, eagerly throwing himself into practice. She even goes so far as to consult men about Jewish practice after services, embarrassing her ambivalent husband. As her husband’s judgy friend writes a book about them, resentment builds in their marriage.
In Ess’s futuristic dystopia, the environment has been destroyed and those with resources live behind massive gates. Humanity is dying out. While her group, called the Network, is preparing for humanity to die out entirely, she agrees to be sent to the past. The science has been based on their people’s foundational texts – specifically the environmental texts and time travel speculation of O. This experimental time travel may be their only hope. But if it succeeds, how is Ess meant to intervene?
In the present, Kay works multiple jobs and parties with her queer underground friends. As they celebrate counterculture, they avoid the news because it’s so depressing and stressful. Kay serves as a link between the eras as her philosophy bridges past and future. She finally finds herself asking, “If you were a tourist…a time-traveler tourist…what would you say when you got to me?” (268). Her lover O responds that a warning, or advice and a road map, would be nice. Further linking the times, she proposes going back to their great-grandparents’ eras to suggest that they run or get organized and resist. “Maybe you could go back far enough that they wouldn’t even need to run” (269). This is the hope of time travel – improving the past to minimize atrocity. When Kay worries about destroying the timeline, O responds, “What’s the point if you don’t get involved?” (269).
The story explores the ethics and goals of time travel, not the technology. Just because humanity can, doesn’t mean they should. All three times also celebrate nature, from the fertile marshes to the parakeets soaring free in the future. Throughout, there’s an environmentalist plea to not destroy everything. All three women read books written by and about one another, even as their stories show how the books came to be written. All this further links their characters’ beliefs and journeys.
As one character observes, “When we talk about time, we should really talk about history…” reminding the reader that “We are trying to avert catastrophe. To change the future. […] Ecosystem: fucked. Resource management: nonexistent. Human and nonhuman rights: thing of the past. The only difference between us is that I’ve known, nearly all my life, I’ve known—there’s a solution. We can fix what we have done. We can undo the mistakes our ancestors made” (232). The novel ends by wondering whether humans will finally find a way to undo all this damage, or whether earth will be better off without humanity. It’s a slow, meditative experimental text that celebrates women and writing even as the three reflect across their eras.
Find It: Amazon | Bookshop








